CVE-2024-26924
MediumIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not free live element Pablo reports a crash with large batches of elements with a back-to-back add/remove pattern. Quoting Pablo: add_elem("00000000") timeout 100 ms ... add_elem("0000000X") timeout 100 ms del_elem("0000000X") <---------------- delete one that was just added ... add_elem("00005000") timeout 100 ms 1) nft_pipapo_remove() removes element 0000000X Then, KASAN shows a splat. Looking at the remove function there is a chance that we will drop a rule that maps to a non-deactivated element. Removal happens in two steps, first we do a lookup for key k and return the to-be-removed element and mark it as inactive in the next generation. Then, in a second step, the element gets removed from the set/map. The _remove function does not work correctly if we have more than one element that share the same key. This can happen if we insert an element into a set when the set already holds an element with same key, but the element mapping to the existing key has timed out or is not active in the next generation. In such case its possible that removal will unmap the wrong element. If this happens, we will leak the non-deactivated element, it becomes unreachable. The element that got deactivated (and will be freed later) will remain reachable in the set data structure, this can result in a crash when such an element is retrieved during lookup (stale pointer). Add a check that the fully matching key does in fact map to the element that we have marked as inactive in the deactivation step. If not, we need to continue searching. Add a bug/warn trap at the end of the function as well, the remove function must not ever be called with an invisible/unreachable/non-existent element. v2: avoid uneeded temporary variable (Stefano)
CVSS 3.1 score
5.9
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness type
CWE-476CVE-2024-26924 is a NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability
What is NULL Pointer Dereference?
The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL, typically causing a crash. Learn more on MITRE CWE
References
The following references provide additional information about CVE-2024-26924 including vendor advisories, patch commits, exploit details, and third-party analysis. Links are sourced from the NIST NVD database.
-
Mailing List Third Party Advisory
-
-
-
-
PatchKernel patch commithttps://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14b001ba221136c15f894577253e8db535b99487
-
PatchKernel patch commithttps://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3cfc9ec039af60dbd8965ae085b2c2ccdcfbe1cc
-
PatchKernel patch commithttps://git.kernel.org/stable/c/41d8fdf3afaff312e17466e4ab732937738d5644
Frequently asked questions
-
What is CVE-2024-26924?
CVE-2024-26924 is a Medium severity Linux kernel vulnerability with a CVSS score of 5.9 out of 10 , classified as a NULL Pointer Dereference flaw (CWE-476) . CVE-2024-26924 has not been confirmed as actively exploited and is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
-
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2024-26924?
CVE-2024-26924 has a CVSS score of 5.9 out of 10, rated Medium severity (CVSS 3.1). The vector string is
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H. -
Is there a patch available for CVE-2024-26924?
No patch is currently available for CVE-2024-26924. Monitor the NIST NVD and your Linux distribution's security advisories for updates.
-
Is CVE-2024-26924 actively exploited?
No — CVE-2024-26924 has not been confirmed as actively exploited. It is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.
-
What is NULL Pointer Dereference (CWE-476)?
The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL, typically causing a crash. View CWE-476 on MITRE CWE →